It’s not just a matter of a few people, it’s a societal issue.”

The Supreme Court’s statement came after a recent case where a judge was subjected to online harassment and threats. This case highlighted the growing concern about the impact of social media on the judiciary. The court acknowledged that even the highest judicial authority in the country is not immune to the dangers of online harassment. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, during a hearing on Monday, expressed his frustration with the escalating online harassment of judges. He stated that the court’s order in favour of one party in a case could be met with online attacks and threats.

the petitioner’s friends are constantly trolling and victim-shaming.”

This statement highlights the ongoing nature of the harassment and the impact it has on the victim’s mental health. It also underscores the importance of addressing the issue of online harassment and its consequences. The representative for Ms.

The court’s statement reflects a growing concern over the prolonged detention of individuals in custody, particularly in cases where bail is readily available. This concern is not limited to India but is a global phenomenon. The court’s decision to grant bail to Mr Kumar highlights the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence. The court recognized that Mr Kumar’s detention for 100 days without a trial was a violation of his fundamental rights. The court’s decision also underscores the need for a more efficient and transparent judicial system. The court’s order to expedite the trial process is a step in the right direction.